best opera extensions for survey bypasing

I received a few complaints from people who felt excluded as a result, and I do appreciate that those people genuinely felt that they were being denied an opportunity to express their views. in-house), or to trade mark attorneys or lawyers. to mean attorneys providing services in the role of external advisors to clients, regardless of whether they are doing so as sole practitioners, members of privately-held practices, or members of publicly-listed groups.) Many of the survey questions were not generally applicable to patent attorneys working other contexts (e.g.

(I am using the term ‘private practice’ in its conventional sense here, i.e. Unsurprisingly, the overwhelming majority – over 90% – of these were from patent attorneys, and trainees, working in private practice in Australia and New Zealand. In the end, I received 247 responses to the survey. What these results indicate is that there is a sound basis for belief that responses to the survey are broadly representative of the wider profession. It is primarily concerned with an analysis of the overall demographics of respondents to the survey, by comparison with the profession as whole. This first article, however, should be relatively free of controversy.

While some of the observations resulting from the survey will be uncontroversial, there are others that I expect (and, indeed, hope) may lead to further conversations about the impact of change on the profession. This is no small task, in view of the number and diversity of responses received.

Over the coming weeks I will be publishing a number of article reporting on the results of the survey.

As many readers will already be aware, between mid-March and April I conducted a survey with the objective of gaining some insights into how members of the trans-Tasman IP profession (primarily patent attorneys) are faring in the face of a challenging market and substantial structural changes within the profession.

Best opera extensions for survey bypasing